Keywords
DALYs
Global Burden of Disease
Age-period-cohort model
ARIMA forecast
Categories
How to Cite
Abstract
Objectives: To quantify the global burden of occupational noise-induced hearing loss (ONHL) from 1990 to 2021 by sex, age, and Socio-demographic Index (SDI), and to project its future trends through 2035. Methods: Data on disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), age-standardized DALY rates (ASDRs), and summary exposure values (SEVs) of ONHL were extracted from the GBD 2021 study. Joinpoint regression was used to estimate annual percent changes in ASDRs. An age-period-cohort model assessed the effects of age, period, and cohort. Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models forecasted DALY trends from 2025 to 2035. Results: Globally, ONHL-related DALYs increased from 3.84 million in 1990 to 7.85 million in 2021, with the highest relative increases in low- and middle-SDI regions. Males consistently had higher burden than females. DALYs peaked in midlife (ages 50-59), while age-specific DALY rates peaked at older ages (60-74). APC analysis revealed significant age effects across all SDI levels, while period and cohort effects were limited. ARIMA models predicted that global ONHL DALYs would reach 9.65 million by 2035, a 22.97% increase from 2021, with largest increases expected in those aged 55-59. Conclusions: Occupational noise–induced hearing loss remains a growing global public health challenge, particularly among male workers in lower-SDI regions. Continued increases are projected over the next decade. These results underscore the urgent need for strengthened hearing conservation strategies and targeted prevention policies to reduce ONHL burden worldwide.
References
[1] Themann C L, Masterson E A. Occupational noise exposure: A review of its effects, epidemiology, and impact with recommendations for reducing its burden. The Journal of the acoustical society of America, 2019,146(5):3879-3905.
[2] Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. The Lancet, 2014,383(9925):1325-1332.
[3] Nelson D I, Nelson R Y, Concha Barrientos M, et al. The global burden of occupational noise‐induced hearing loss. American journal of industrial medicine, 2005,48(6):446-458.
[4] Schmid J A, Jarczok M N, Sonntag D, et al. Associations between supportive leadership behavior and the costs of absenteeism and presenteeism: An epidemiological and economic approach. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2017,59(2):141-147.
[5] Haile L M, Kamenov K, Briant P S, et al. Hearing loss prevalence and years lived with disability, 1990-2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet, 2021,397(10278):996-1009.
[6] Skogstad M, Johannessen H A, Tynes T, et al. Systematic review of the cardiovascular effects of occupational noise. Occupational medicine, 2016,66(1):10-16.
[7] Ristovska G, Laszlo H E, Hansell A L. Reproductive outcome associated with noise exposure -a systematic review of the literature. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2014,11(8):7931-7952.
[8] Tak S, Davis R R, Calvert G M. Exposure to hazardous workplace noise and use of hearing protection devices among US workers -NHANES, 1999-2004. American journal of industrial medicine, 2009,52(5):358-371.
[9] Kerns E, Masterson E A, Themann C L, et al. Cardiovascular conditions, hearing difficulty, and occupational noise exposure within US industries and occupations. American journal of industrial medicine, 2018,61(6):477-491.
[10] Kujawa S G, Liberman M C. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss. Journal of Neuroscience, 2009,29(45):14077-14085.
[11] Murray C J, Aravkin A Y, Zheng P, et al. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The lancet, 2020,396(10258):1223-1249.
[12] Agrawal Y, Platz E A, Niparko J K. Prevalence of hearing loss and differences by demographic characteristics among US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004. Archives of internal medicine, 2008,168(14):1522-1530.
[13] Seixas N S, Goldman B, Sheppard L, et al. Prospective noise induced changes to hearing among construction industry apprentices. Occupational and environmental medicine, 2005,62(5):309-317.
[14] Masterson E A. Hearing impairment among noise-exposed workers -United States, 2003-2012. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 2016,65.
[15] Fuente A, Hickson L. Noise-induced hearing loss in Asia. International journal of audiology, 2011,50(sup1): S3-S10.
[16] Kujawa S G, Liberman M C. Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: Primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss. Hearing research, 2015,330:191-199.
[17] Organization W H. World report on hearing. World Health Organization, 2021.
[18] Lie A, Skogstad M, Johannessen H A, et al. Occupational noise exposure and hearing: a systematic review. International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2016,89(3):351-372.
[19] Tikka C, Verbeek J H, Kateman E, et al. Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(7).
[20] Davis R I, Qiu W, Heyer N J, et al. The use of the kurtosis metric in the evaluation of occupational hearing loss in workers in China: Implications for hearing risk assessment. Noise and Health, 2012,14(61):330-342.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Preventive Medicine